Skip to main content

Nonprofit · EIN 68-0260751

CENTER FOR ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND RENEWABLE TECHNOLOGIES

Tax-exempt · SACRAMENTO, CA 95814

Financials

$1.2M$1.3M2023$1M$1.4M2024
Revenue Expenses · by fiscal year end
Financials of CENTER FOR ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND RENEWABLE TECHNOLOGIES by year, from its e-filed returns
Year endedFormRevenueExpensesNet incomeTotal assetsLiabilitiesNet assets
December 31, 2024990$1,040,795$1,350,932-$310,137$282,556$407,136-$124,580
December 31, 2023990$1,179,747$1,261,120-$81,373$671,668$486,111$185,557
Financial details: 990 for the year ended December 31, 2024

Revenue

Contributions, gifts and grants
$1,044,071
Program service revenue
$0
Investment income
$10,124
Net income from fundraising events
-$13,400
Other revenue
-$13,400

Expenses

Grants and similar amounts paid
$0
Compensation of officers, directors and key employees
$256,348
Other salaries and wages
$268,149
Salaries, compensation and benefits (total)
$712,922
Professional fundraising fees
$0
Legal fees
$2,691
Accounting fees
$18,000
Occupancy
$150,424
Travel
$23,176
Depreciation
$5,077
Program services (functional)
$1,013,202
Management and general (functional)
$337,730

Balance sheet and other

Total assets, start of year
$671,668
Total assets, end of year
$282,556
Total liabilities, end of year
$407,136
Net assets, end of year
-$124,580
Land, buildings and equipment
$8,976
Net assets without donor restrictions
-$163,302
Net assets with donor restrictions
$38,722
Gross receipts
$1,054,195
Employees
8
Volunteers
24
Year formed
1991
State of legal domicile
CA

From the e-filed returns the IRS publishes as XML (latest three processing years; amended returns replace the original). PDF copies at the IRS.

Officers, directors and key employees

As listed on the 990 for the year ended December 31, 2024, highest compensation first.

NameTitleHours / weekCompensationOther / benefits
V John WhiteExecutive Dir.
Officer
40$150,367$25,593
Kimber WestDir. Operations
Officer
40$105,980$30,883
Jonathan WeisgallDirector
Trustee or director
0.3$0$0
Catherine GaroupaDirector
Trustee or director
0.3$0$0
Bill MagavernDirector
Trustee or director
0.3$0$0
James Caldwell JrDirector
Trustee or director
0.3$0$0
Dan KimDirector
Trustee or director
0.3$0$0
Nick GoodmanDirector
Trustee or director
0.3$0$0
Mark SpechtDirector
Trustee or director
0.3$0$0
Rey LeonDirector
Trustee or director
0.3$0$0
Vijay SatyalDirector
Trustee or director
0.3$0$0
Jan McFarlandDirector
Trustee or director
0.3$0$0
Michael ColvinCo-Chair
Trustee or director, Officer
0.3$0$0
Lauren KubiakDirector
Trustee or director
0.3$0$0
Luis OlmedoDirector
Trustee or director
0.3$0$0
6 more people on this return
NameTitleHours / weekCompensation
Ed SmeloffDirector
Trustee or director
0.3$0
Thomas StarrsCo-Chair
Trustee or director, Officer
0.3$0
Katie RamseyDirector
Trustee or director
0.3$0
Eduardo GarciaDirector
Trustee or director
0.3$0
Luis AmezcuaDirector
Trustee or director
0.3$0
Patsy BaynardSec/Treasurer
Trustee or director, Officer
0.3$0
990 for the year ended December 31, 2023: 26 people
NameTitleHours / weekCompensationOther / benefits
V John WhiteExecutive Dir.
Officer
40$127,166$25,725
Kimber WestDir. Operations
Officer
40$89,450$26,251
Jonathan WeisgallDirector
Trustee or director
0.3$0$0
Catherine GaroupaDirector
Trustee or director
0.3$0$0
Arthur HaubenstockSec/Treas
Trustee or director, Officer
0.3$0$0
Bill MagavernDirector
Trustee or director
0.3$0$0
James Caldwell JrDirector
Trustee or director
0.3$0$0
Parin ShahDirector
Trustee or director
0.3$0$0
Alex JacksonDirector
Trustee or director
0.3$0$0
Dan KimDirector
Trustee or director
0.3$0$0
Nick GoodmanDirector
Trustee or director
0.3$0$0
Mark SpechtDirector
Trustee or director
0.3$0$0
Nicole HughesDirector
Trustee or director
0.3$0$0
Rey LeonDirector
Trustee or director
0.3$0$0
Vijay SatyalDirector
Trustee or director
0.3$0$0
Virinder SinghDirector
Trustee or director
0.3$0$0
Jan McFarlandDirector
Trustee or director
0.3$0$0
Michael ColvinDirector
Trustee or director
0.3$0$0
Lauren KubiakDirector
Trustee or director
0.3$0$0
Luis OlmedoDirector
Trustee or director
0.3$0$0
Ed SmeloffDirector
Trustee or director
0.3$0$0
Thomas StarrsCo-Chair
Trustee or director, Officer
0.3$0$0
Teresa ChengDirector
Trustee or director
0.3$0$0
Frank DeRosaDirector
Trustee or director
0.3$0$0
Luis AmezcuaDirector
Trustee or director
0.3$0$0
Patsy BaynardDirector
Trustee or director
0.3$0$0

Address and contacts

Address (IRS master file)
1017 L ST, SACRAMENTO, CA 95814-3805
In care of
% HEATHER EDMONDS
Principal officer (990 for 2024)
Michael Colvin, 1100 11th Street 311, Sacramento, CA 95814
Signed the 990
Michael Colvin, Co-Chair
Phone
(916) 442-7785
Return prepared by
Beebout Williams & Olds CPAs

California records

California keeps its own records of charities and corporations. Search them by EIN 68-0260751 or by the name CENTER FOR ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND RENEWABLE TECHNOLOGIES.

Attorney General, Registry of Charities and Fundraisers
Registration status and filed reports (CT-TR-1, RRF-1)

Mission

CEERT designs and fights for policies that advance clean, renewable, energy and climate solutions for California and the West. CEERT's team of professional staff, active board members, expert consultants, and clean-technology and environmental affiliates carry out our work through a set of focused advocacy programs. We act as participants and intervenors before all the major governmental energy, climate, and air-quality agencies. CEERT is pressing for the necessary changes in grid operations, renewable procurement, and climate policies that will enable California to reach its groundbreaking new energy and greenhouse-gas reduction goals, and put the entire Western region on the path to a low-carbon electric system and a clean-energy future.

990 for the year ended December 31, 2024

Program accomplishments

  • During 2023, CEERT accomplished the following:CEERTs multi-year advocacy was instrumental in a California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) Decision adopting a Preferred System Plan that meets an unprecedentedly low 25-million metric ton greenhouse-gas emissions target for the power sector by 2035. This PSP portfolio will enable California to meet its ambitious climate and clean-energy goals, and to reduce GHG emissions on the California Independent System Operator (CAISO) grid by 85% in 2045 while achieving a level of 113% clean energy (including exports). CAISOs 2022-2023 Transmission Plan (TP) mapped a 2032 base scenario of 26,597 mega-watts (MW) in new clean generation, while a more far-reaching 2035 sensitivity scenario studied transmission needs for 70,489 MW of clean resources. CEERT successfully argued at the CAISO and CPUC that this sensitivity scenario be the base case for the 2023-2024 TP. We are now advocating for an even more aggressive base case in the 2024-2025 TP. Partnered with our affiliates Latino Equity Advocacy and Policy Institute and Golden State Clean Energy/Westlands Solar Park to realize the San Joaquin Valley's potential for 30,000 megawatts of new large-scale solar, bring the benefits of those projects to local communities, and secure residents full access to workforce training and employment programs. Worked closely with Comit Civico del Valle, Berkshire Hathaway Energy, and the Imperial Irrigation District to secure maximal development of new 24/7 geothermal generating plants by the Salton Sea, the extraction of lithium from geothermal brine, and community benefits and workforce training opportunities for Imperial Valley residents. With our allies in nearby states, furthered recent encouraging progress on the establishment of an Extended Day-Ahead Market and an eventual Regional Transmission Organization, both of which will result in improved renewables trading and cost savings across the West. Published three hard-hitting, widely distributed reports on key transmission expansion projects for California, especially in the Los Angeles Basin to reduce dependence on gas-fired power plants and in the Central Valley to greatly increase solar generation output. Began to push for increased adoption and use of grid-enhancing technologies, dynamic line rating, advanced power conductors, and high-voltage direct-current lines in advocating with state agencies for expanding transmission capacity in affordable ways.Worked to establish a Central Procurement Entity for long lead-time resources with system-wide benefits, including geothermal, offshore wind, and pumped hydro storage.In light of the states budget deficit, advocated that the CEC rescind operating subsidies from the general fund for the Diablo Canyon nuclear facility and outmoded gas-fired plants, and reallocate the funds to clean energy and demand-response infrastructure. Considerably advanced state plans for expanded transmission. In May the CAISO adopted its 2022-2023 Transmission Plan (TP), which detailed a ten-year 2032 base scenario of 26,597 MW in new clean generation. A more far-reaching 2035 sensitivity scenario studied transmission needs for 70,489 MW of new clean resources, encompassing 33,640 MW of solar, 12,301 MW of wind, 20,673 MW of battery storage, 2,000 MW of long-duration storage, and 1,746 MW of geothermal. CEERTs vigorous transmission advocacy at the CAISO and CPUC, and our three recent transmission reports, successfully argued that this sensitivity scenario be used as the base-case portfolio for the 2023-2024 TP. We are now advocating that an even more aggressive base-case be used for the upcoming 2024-2025 TP. Published three widely distributed reports on transmission: the first on planning and key projects in California; the second on the need to expand transmission into the Los Angeles Basin to improve reliability and reduce dependence on gas-fired plants; and the third on the need to expand transmission in the Central Valley to enable large-scale solar and storage projects on disturbed, formerly agricultural land. Worked with Renewable Northwest, Western Resource Advocates, Western Grid Group, and other partners in neighboring states to further recent encouraging progress toward establishing an Extended Day-Ahead Market and an eventual Regional Transmission Organization, both of which will result in improved renewables trading and cost savings across the West. Began to push for increased adoption and use of grid-enhancing technologies, dynamic line rating, advanced power conductors, and high-voltage direct-current lines in advocating with state agencies for expanding near-term transmission capacity in affordable ways.The CAISO has identified 30,000 MW of solar that can be developed in the Central Valley. CEERT Valley affiliate Westlands Solar Park is California's largest renewable energy project, and has a capacity of 2,700 MW, of which 1,170 are in active development or already constructed. We are working with WSP on permitting and the expanded transmission capacity that their projects require. CEERT is also collaborating with our longtime affiliate Latino Equity Advocacy and Policy Institute on securing local residents access to workforce training and employment programs as a major part of an overall benefits package for disadvantaged communities that are adjacent to large-scale solar generation sites in the Valley. In the Imperial Valley, CEERT is working closely with Comit Civico del Valle, Berkshire Hathaway Energy, and the Imperial Irrigation District to secure maximal development of new 24/7 geothermal generating plants along with the extraction of lithium from geothermal brine, and a robust Community Benefits Agreement to accompany this development. Comit Civico del Valle has appointed CEERT Executive Director V. John White to its Technical Advisory Committee for the Imperial County Programmatic Environmental Impact Report on expanding geothermal power production and developing lithium recovery facilities. CEERTs multi-year advocacy was instrumental in a 2/14/24 CPUC Decision adopting a Preferred System Plan portfolio that meets an unprecedentedly low 25-million metric ton greenhouse-gas target for the power sector by 2035. This PSP portfolio would enable California to meet its ambitious climate and clean-energy goals, and reduce GHG emissions on the CAISO grid by 58% in 2035 and by 85% in 2045, compared to 2020, while achieving a level of 113% clean energy (including exports). In line with CEERTs advocacy, the CPUCs 2/14/24 Decision additionally recommended that the CAISO analyze the transmission buildout needed to retire 15,000 megawatts of gas-fired generation by 2039, at which point, according to CPUC President Alice Reynolds, the use of gas-fired generation would be reduced by 90% from 2024 levels.During the year, CARB staff determined, in accord with CEERTs position, that the CARB Climate Change Scoping Plans overreliance on carbon capture and storage (CCS) technologies would not achieve California's 2030 climate goals, and additional emission-reduction measures, including tightening up cap-and-trade limits, will be needed. CEERTs V. John White worked with the CARB Scoping Plan communications team, and suggested that they adopt a Climate Implementation Plan to track progress in GHG reductions and identify weaknesses and failures that can be mitigated. Pushed for reform and updating of CPUC General Order (GO) 131-D, which governs the siting of transmission infrastructure in California, to bring it in line with the directives of Senate Bill 529 that call for expediting the permitting of transmission upgrades and expansions. With many other parties, we objected to a proposed decision that ignored a broadly supported multi-party Settlement Agreement covering modifications of GO 131-D, and we advocated that Phase 2 of the proceeding take up additional needed changes. Strongly opposed a decision in the Resource Adequacy proceeding that adopted rules that are contrary to law, fact, and policy, and wrongly impose unsupported adverse impacts on Demand Response (DR) programs and providers. CEERT has long upheld DR as a crucial resource that can displace gas, provide grid reliability and flexibility, and avoid rolling blackouts during heat waves. With allied parties, persuaded the CPUC in its Resource Adequacy proceeding to include greenhouse-gas heat rate information on publicly available disadvantaged community status in its Master Resource Database. Helped induce the CPUC in its Integrated Resource Planning (IRP) proceeding to consider, at such point as it becomes more feasible, a longer-term planning horizon for future generation and transmission projects.Recommended that a new sensitivity case be developed in the IRP to eliminate gas-fired power plants adjacent to disadvantaged communities in the Los Angeles Basin, and continued to oppose the use of the problematic RESOLVE tool for capacity expansion modeling. Took pa
    Expenses $1,013,202

What it must file and when

IRS records say it files Form 990 or 990-EZ. Based on its last return; a smaller organization may file the 990-N. Its accounting year ends in December, so each return is due on the 15th day of the 5th month after that.

Tax yearYear endedDueIRS public records
2025December 31, 2025May 15, 2026Not on file
2024December 31, 2024May 15, 2025990 on file
2023December 31, 2023May 15, 2024990 on file

IRS record

EIN
68-0260751
Tax-exempt status
501(c)(3): Charitable, religious, educational or scientific organization
Foundation status
Publicly supported organization (170(b)(1)(A)(vi))
Donations deductible (Pub 78)
Public charity, 50% deduction limit
Exempt since
1992
Accounting year ends
December
Files
Form 990 or 990-EZ
Category (NTEE)
Environment (C053)
Assets (IRS master file)
$282,556
Income (IRS master file)
$1,054,195

Filing history

FormYear endedRevenueExpensesAssetsReturn
990December 2024$1,040,795$1,350,932$282,556XML
990December 2023$1,179,747$1,261,120$671,668XML
990December 2022$1,009,222$988,211$824,699IRS
990December 2021–––IRS
990December 2020–––IRS
990December 2019–––IRS
990December 2018–––IRS
990December 2017–––IRS

990-N: the IRS bulk file holds only the latest e-Postcard per organization; earlier years come from archived copies of that file since 2020 and can have gaps (the IRS e-Postcard search lists every one). 990, 990-EZ, 990-PF, 990-T: every e-filed return in the IRS e-file index since 2019; XML for the latest three processing years, amounts from the IRS Statistics of Income extracts before that. PDF copies and determination letters at the IRS (search EIN 68-0260751).

Questions about CENTER FOR ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND RENEWABLE TECHNOLOGIES

What is the EIN of CENTER FOR ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND RENEWABLE TECHNOLOGIES?
The employer identification number (EIN) of CENTER FOR ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND RENEWABLE TECHNOLOGIES is 68-0260751.
Is CENTER FOR ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND RENEWABLE TECHNOLOGIES tax-exempt?
Yes. The IRS lists it as tax-exempt under section 501(c)(3) since 1992.
Are donations to CENTER FOR ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND RENEWABLE TECHNOLOGIES tax-deductible?
Yes. It is listed in IRS Publication 78 (Public charity, 50% deduction limit).
Which annual return does CENTER FOR ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND RENEWABLE TECHNOLOGIES file?
Form 990 or 990-EZ. Based on its last return; a smaller organization may file the 990-N.
When is the next return of CENTER FOR ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND RENEWABLE TECHNOLOGIES due?
The return for tax year 2025 (the year ending December 31, 2025) is due May 15, 2026. Form 8868 extends it by six months; the 990-N cannot be extended.
When did CENTER FOR ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND RENEWABLE TECHNOLOGIES last file with the IRS?
The latest return in the IRS public files is the 990 for the year ended December 2024.
Who is the principal officer of CENTER FOR ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND RENEWABLE TECHNOLOGIES?
The 990 for the year ended December 31, 2024 names Michael Colvin.
Who are the officers and directors of CENTER FOR ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND RENEWABLE TECHNOLOGIES?
The 990 for the year ended December 31, 2024 lists 21 people; 2 received compensation from the organization, the highest $150,367 (V John White, Executive Dir.).
How much revenue does CENTER FOR ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND RENEWABLE TECHNOLOGIES have?
On its 990 for the year ended December 31, 2024 it reported revenue of $1,040,795, expenses of $1,350,932 and total assets of $282,556 at year end.

Other nonprofits in SACRAMENTO

All nonprofits in SACRAMENTO · California · Environment